nanogui: X11 vs framebuffer


Previous by date: 10 Jul 2007 20:21:03 +0100 client/server nano-x howto ??, Islam Samir
Next by date: 10 Jul 2007 20:21:03 +0100 Re: X11 vs framebuffer, Greg Haerr
Previous in thread: 10 Jul 2007 20:21:03 +0100 Re: X11 vs framebuffer, Greg Haerr
Next in thread: 10 Jul 2007 20:21:03 +0100 Re: X11 vs framebuffer, Greg Haerr

Subject: Re: [nanogui] X11 vs framebuffer
From: "Kernel Mojo" ####@####.####
Date: 10 Jul 2007 20:21:03 +0100
Message-Id: <1c1bf1150707101221x183d2cal812bb4b52ed8019@mail.gmail.com>

The mouse pointer can be turned off in the config file (NOMOUSE = Y)
ONLY IF framebuffer support is selected (i.e. X11 = N), correct?

I assumed that X11 would have to be re-configured to turn off the mouse
pointer but that that would be an effect global to all Linux X11 apps.

I'll probably have to rebuild the kernel with framebuffer support and make
the mouse pointer disappear the correct way.

Thanks,
Russ

On 7/2/07, Greg Haerr ####@####.#### wrote:
>
> : Can I configure my nanox application to execute on my touchscreen
> desktop
> : using X11 without the "Microwindows" app frame and mouse pointer
> displayed?
> : Or must I use a framebuffer device to accomplish this?
>
> If you're going to run micorwindows on top of X11, and don't
> want the X11 window dressings, then you'll either have to
> position the X11 window off the screen to the top left, or
> modify the X11 open call in drivers/scr_x11.c.  The microwindows
> mouse pointer can be turned off in the config file.
>
> Otherwise, its simpler using framebuffer!
>
> Regards,
>
> Greg
>
>
>

Previous by date: 10 Jul 2007 20:21:03 +0100 client/server nano-x howto ??, Islam Samir
Next by date: 10 Jul 2007 20:21:03 +0100 Re: X11 vs framebuffer, Greg Haerr
Previous in thread: 10 Jul 2007 20:21:03 +0100 Re: X11 vs framebuffer, Greg Haerr
Next in thread: 10 Jul 2007 20:21:03 +0100 Re: X11 vs framebuffer, Greg Haerr


Powered by ezmlm-browse 0.20.