nanogui: Microwindow+GTK or FLTK??


Previous by date: 19 May 2009 01:26:26 -0000 Re: Microwindow+GTK or FLTK??, Aaron J. Grier
Next by date: 19 May 2009 01:26:26 -0000 Re: Microwindow+GTK or FLTK??, Aaron J. Grier
Previous in thread: 19 May 2009 01:26:26 -0000 Re: Microwindow+GTK or FLTK??, Aaron J. Grier
Next in thread: 19 May 2009 01:26:26 -0000 Re: Microwindow+GTK or FLTK??, Aaron J. Grier

Subject: Re: [nanogui] Re: Microwindow+GTK or FLTK??
From: "Greg Haerr" ####@####.####
Date: 19 May 2009 01:26:26 -0000
Message-Id: <0d9001c9d820$d019bab0$6464a8c0@winXP>

: I believe the preferred method is using the XtoNX.h header, which
: translates X calls to nano-X calls.  I have read success reports with
: FLTK using this method, and it wouldn't surprise me if GTK works
: similarly.

Aaron - No, the XtoNX.h header was used for very early
versions of NXLIB, which required recompilation of X11
libraries and binaries.  The current NXLIB works by replacing
libX11.so and does not require any re-compilation of the
application.

This has been tested for FLTK v1.x which works great.  It
has also been tested with GTK, but there may be more work
to be done in some cases.  Thus, I would suggest using FLTK
for use with nano-X.  If the application runs on X11, using
FLTK with NXLIB should allow it to port unmodified to nano-X.

Regards,

Greg


Previous by date: 19 May 2009 01:26:26 -0000 Re: Microwindow+GTK or FLTK??, Aaron J. Grier
Next by date: 19 May 2009 01:26:26 -0000 Re: Microwindow+GTK or FLTK??, Aaron J. Grier
Previous in thread: 19 May 2009 01:26:26 -0000 Re: Microwindow+GTK or FLTK??, Aaron J. Grier
Next in thread: 19 May 2009 01:26:26 -0000 Re: Microwindow+GTK or FLTK??, Aaron J. Grier


Powered by ezmlm-browse 0.20.