nanogui: Licensing


Previous by date: 12 May 1999 16:43:37 -0000 Re: nanoX bugfix v0.4 coming, Ben Pfaff
Next by date: 12 May 1999 16:43:37 -0000 Re: nanoX bugfix v0.4 coming, Greg Haerr
Previous in thread: 12 May 1999 16:43:37 -0000 Re: Licensing, Greg Haerr
Next in thread: 12 May 1999 16:43:37 -0000 Re: Licensing, Greg Haerr

Subject: Re: Re[2]: Licensing
From: Alan Cox ####@####.####
Date: 12 May 1999 16:43:37 -0000
Message-Id: <E10hcpk-0000L5-00@the-village.bc.nu>

> I am *considerably* rewriting all sorts of code in the same files, as well as adding
> new code in the same and new files.  Is this a problem?  Does this mean that we
> can add a GPL header and also retain David's use statement, which seem contradictory?


They may seem contradictory but they are not. You probably want to put something
in the header like

	[USUAL GPL header]

	derived from code by [Author] under the following license

	.............

	
	You can obtain the original code from ...

(The last item isnt required but its polite)


Previous by date: 12 May 1999 16:43:37 -0000 Re: nanoX bugfix v0.4 coming, Ben Pfaff
Next by date: 12 May 1999 16:43:37 -0000 Re: nanoX bugfix v0.4 coming, Greg Haerr
Previous in thread: 12 May 1999 16:43:37 -0000 Re: Licensing, Greg Haerr
Next in thread: 12 May 1999 16:43:37 -0000 Re: Licensing, Greg Haerr


Powered by ezmlm-browse 0.20.