nanogui: New Microwindows font support


Previous by date: 21 Mar 2000 20:41:08 -0000 Re: OT TROLL: Re: What is the status of porting Opera to MicroWindows ?, Alex Holden
Next by date: 21 Mar 2000 20:41:08 -0000 Re: New Microwindows font support, vidar.hokstad.com
Previous in thread: 21 Mar 2000 20:41:08 -0000 Re: New Microwindows font support, Rob Leslie
Next in thread: 21 Mar 2000 20:41:08 -0000 Re: New Microwindows font support, vidar.hokstad.com

Subject: Re: New Microwindows font support
From: ####@####.####
Date: 21 Mar 2000 20:41:08 -0000
Message-Id: <20000321203035.21905.qmail@nameplanet.com>

On Tue, 21 Mar 2000 18:43:21 +0000 Morten Rolland ####@####.#### 
>For Unicode-32, I was thinking the scalar function could come in
>handy, but now I'm not even sure there is such a thing as
>Unicode-32; although I would not be surprised if it contained
>the scalar values, or code-points or whatever they are called

Unicode can be represented either as UCS-16 (16 bit unicode *only*),
UCS-32 (the full 32 bit Unicode set), *or* as one of the multibyte
encodings UTF-7, UTF-8 and UTF-16. UCS-16 and UCS-32 values are the
"raw" glyph numbers, and will always be 16 bit or 32 bit.

UTF-7, UTF-8 and UTF-16 all use one or more (depending on value)
7, 8 or 16 bit characters to represent one UCS-32 value. So UTF-7,8
and 16 are all just different ways to encode 32 bit unicode glyphs.

The only format to really avoid is UCS-16, since it can't contain the
full Unicode glyph set...

Vidar.



-- 
Get your firstname@lastname email for FREE at http://NamePlanet.com

Previous by date: 21 Mar 2000 20:41:08 -0000 Re: OT TROLL: Re: What is the status of porting Opera to MicroWindows ?, Alex Holden
Next by date: 21 Mar 2000 20:41:08 -0000 Re: New Microwindows font support, vidar.hokstad.com
Previous in thread: 21 Mar 2000 20:41:08 -0000 Re: New Microwindows font support, Rob Leslie
Next in thread: 21 Mar 2000 20:41:08 -0000 Re: New Microwindows font support, vidar.hokstad.com


Powered by ezmlm-browse 0.20.