nanogui: QT Port?
Subject:
RE: QT Port?
From:
Jean-Eric Cuendet ####@####.####
Date:
14 Apr 2000 14:09:53 -0000
Message-Id: <B45465FD9C23D21193E90000F8D0F3DF683290@mailsrv.linkvest.ch>
>
> > Don't forget that KDE is the leading desktop on Linux. So,
> having Qt is a
> > non-negligeable gain.
>
> Surveys dont seem to think its that simple 8)
>
> It boils down to this though.
>
> If you want qt on nanogui go read the license and if you
> happy with it then
> hack on it. Ditto for Gtk and for Fltk.
>
> Personally I think fltk is the smallest and most exciting
> toolkit for this
> space
>
You're right on FLTK. But I think that having microwindows even on
workstations is quite interesting.
You don't have to miss with all this X11 stuff. It's acceptable if you don't
need acceleration or remote access. IMO, it's acceptable for ~90% of guys
that do office work.
-jec
