nanogui: May I ask some questions bout the nano-X?
Subject:
Re: May I ask some questions bout the nano-X?
From:
"Chris Ross ( Boris` )" ####@####.####
Date:
1 Jun 2000 10:38:24 -0000
Message-Id: <39363D10.94BC02FC@darkrock.co.uk>
Greg Haerr wrote:
>
> : I know that the original X is too big for my tiny ARM-evaluation board.
> : I'm using a Strong ARM SA-1110. and I want to know that is it regular to
> : get these errors? I cross-compiled the source and added in the ramdisk
> : image.
> : when I booted to arm, and tried to run I got these messages:
> : Illegal Instruction on PC = 0x......................(can't
> : remember...sorry)
> :
> : I compiled with these options
> : : Compiling: Optimize
> : : Platform: Linux-ARM (x-compile) -> tools prefix: arm-linux-
> : screen driver: Framebuffer
> : mouse driver: Touch screen
> : kerboard driver: No keyboard
> : : Libraries: NanoX , Microwindows
> : : Color: Didn't change
> : : I/O: none
> : : misc: none
> :
> : Hmm... have anyone else tested with SA-1110? mine seems not to work.
>
> I've had Microwindows running for some time on
> a StrongARM SA1110. There is a kernel patch that is
> required from Rusell King's distribution for the 1110,
> which specifies a processor ID, I think. I have a
> complete kernel source tree as well as the SA1110 patch
> and my UCB1200 touch screen driver along with a readme
> at ftp://microwindows.org/pub/ads
>
> This kernel builds and runs on the ADS graphics client
> (www.flatpanels.com)
>
> Regards,
>
> Greg
where can i find info on these eval boards people are talking about
with the touch screens?
chris
--
=======================================================
| Chris Ross ( boris ) ####@####.#### |
| http://www.darkrock.co.uk ####@####.#### |
`-----------------------------------------------------'
Make a wish, it might come true.
