nanogui: Bug in srvclip2.c


Previous by date: 3 Oct 2000 20:51:26 -0000 Re: Bug in srvclip2.c, Alex Holden
Next by date: 3 Oct 2000 20:51:26 -0000 Re: Bug in srvclip2.c, peter.igelaus.com.au
Previous in thread: 3 Oct 2000 20:51:26 -0000 Re: Bug in srvclip2.c, Alex Holden
Next in thread: 3 Oct 2000 20:51:26 -0000 Re: Bug in srvclip2.c, peter.igelaus.com.au

Subject: Re: Bug in srvclip2.c
From: "Greg Haerr" ####@####.####
Date: 3 Oct 2000 20:51:26 -0000
Message-Id: <018001c02d7c$5ddd1b20$6817dbd0@censoft.com>

: If I understood it right though, I think he wants to wait for a specific
: requested time rather than "when the next event happens, or we time out
: waiting for one". 

Yes.  Good point.  I've already implemented the first, easy
version that returns either the next event or a timeout event
after the specified msecs.  So the event handler for the
timeout event should compare the start time with the
time of day on return.  This will have to happen anyway
if the application has multiple timers running.  This is
the same way that Microwindows does it for the win32
handling, using MwGetNextTimeoutValue().

Regards,

Greg


Previous by date: 3 Oct 2000 20:51:26 -0000 Re: Bug in srvclip2.c, Alex Holden
Next by date: 3 Oct 2000 20:51:26 -0000 Re: Bug in srvclip2.c, peter.igelaus.com.au
Previous in thread: 3 Oct 2000 20:51:26 -0000 Re: Bug in srvclip2.c, Alex Holden
Next in thread: 3 Oct 2000 20:51:26 -0000 Re: Bug in srvclip2.c, peter.igelaus.com.au


Powered by ezmlm-browse 0.20.