| Previous by date: | 20 May 1999 19:55:32 -0000 Re: Bitblt proposal (was: Re: bogl routines), Greg Haerr |
| Next by date: | 20 May 1999 19:55:32 -0000 rearchitecture discussion, Greg Haerr |
| Previous in thread: | 20 May 1999 19:55:32 -0000 Re: nano-X driver stability discussion, Alex Holden |
| Next in thread: |
> Do you mean that since write takes an int as the length argument, it can't > write more than 64K at a time on 16 machines? > Exactly. Worse, it can't write exactly 64k, since that's 0 ;-)
| Previous by date: | 20 May 1999 19:55:32 -0000 Re: Bitblt proposal (was: Re: bogl routines), Greg Haerr |
| Next by date: | 20 May 1999 19:55:32 -0000 rearchitecture discussion, Greg Haerr |
| Previous in thread: | 20 May 1999 19:55:32 -0000 Re: nano-X driver stability discussion, Alex Holden |
| Next in thread: |