nanogui: Truecolour, Pseudocolour


Previous by date: 21 May 1999 14:12:20 -0000 Re: Questions?, Alex Holden
Next by date: 21 May 1999 14:12:20 -0000 Nano-X protocol and architecture, Bradley D. LaRonde
Previous in thread: 21 May 1999 14:12:20 -0000 Truecolour, Pseudocolour, Alex Holden
Next in thread: 21 May 1999 14:12:20 -0000 Re: Truecolour, Pseudocolour, Alex Holden

Subject: Re: Truecolour, Pseudocolour
From: Ben Pfaff ####@####.####
Date: 21 May 1999 14:12:20 -0000
Message-Id: <87lnei5wu1.fsf@pfaffben.user.msu.edu>

Alex Holden ####@####.#### writes:

   I just came to add the readpixel() to the bogl-tcfb and bogl-pcfb drivers,
   and wondering whether I should make it a common function for both drivers
   in bogl-cfb.c or not, decided to compare the two files to see what the
   difference is in the way the two modes are handled. It turns out that 
   apart from the naming differences, about 99% of the code is exactly the
   same. Is it planned to diverge the two further in future for optimisation
   reasons, or would it be a better idea to combine them into one driver?

I'm not sure what ####@####.#### had in mind.  I'll try to take a look
today or tomorrow.  I'm sure that it would be fine to combine them if
it wouldn't mean a big performance hit.
-- 
"It takes a certain amount of shamelessness
 to be a monomaniac billionaire dwarf."
--Jon Katz <URL:http://slashdot.org/articles/99/03/17/1634238.shtml>

Previous by date: 21 May 1999 14:12:20 -0000 Re: Questions?, Alex Holden
Next by date: 21 May 1999 14:12:20 -0000 Nano-X protocol and architecture, Bradley D. LaRonde
Previous in thread: 21 May 1999 14:12:20 -0000 Truecolour, Pseudocolour, Alex Holden
Next in thread: 21 May 1999 14:12:20 -0000 Re: Truecolour, Pseudocolour, Alex Holden


Powered by ezmlm-browse 0.20.