nanogui: nanogui widget set
Subject:
Re: nanogui widget set
From:
Lajber Zoltan ####@####.####
Date:
11 Jun 1999 22:48:00 -0000
Message-Id: <Pine.LNX.4.02.9906120021190.8455-100000@lajli.gau.hu>
On Fri, 11 Jun 1999, Alan Cox wrote:
> > Well, fltk is _relatively_ small and simple. The lib is around 500k. It
> > run on X, OpenGL, and win32 api.
>
> I really really worry about the "500K is small and simple" folks. This is
> meant to be a small GUI. Think "50K is large" please
In this case we need to write one. The "W widget set" is about this size,
but it's ugly isn't?
Bye the way, before we do something, what is the requirements for this
widget set?
I'm new on this, so please tell me some, if decided already.
We need buttons (normal, radio, check, light, image), menus, edit (single
and multi line) and list controls. A combo with list/edit. Any more?
On what platforms?
It determine the size of the avaiable boot device, the size of memory, and
even the programming language.
I need Linux on strongARM, PPC, maybe alpha, not decided yet
The boot device is from 2M, ram is in 16-32M.
I think the m68k is interesting too, but not the ELKS, becouse it stick to
x86.
It looks like Lalo Martins sayd: one extremly small and one
with comparable with desktop widget sets.
For me, the main restriction is not the RAM size, but the boot device
size. What is your aim: 1M with kernel and nanoX+widget?
Alain, for an extremly small, the gpm driver is not suitable, imho.
Bye,
-=Lajbi=--------------------------------------------------------------------
LAJBER Zoltan ####@####.#### http://jht.gau.hu/~lajbi
GATE Jarmu- es Hotechnika Tanszek http://jht.gau.hu
A member of HuLUG http://mlf.linux.rulez.org/mlf
