nanogui: GnuStep port to nano-X


Previous by date: 17 May 2001 03:10:51 -0000 Re: MicroWindows' IPC?, PcHome
Next by date: 17 May 2001 03:10:51 -0000 Re: GTK+ port to nano-X, Gary James
Previous in thread: 17 May 2001 03:10:51 -0000 Re: GnuStep port to nano-X, Alan Cox
Next in thread: 17 May 2001 03:10:51 -0000 Re: GnuStep port to nano-X, Jordan Crouse

Subject: Re: GnuStep port to nano-X
From: Gary James ####@####.####
Date: 17 May 2001 03:10:51 -0000
Message-Id: <20010516231013.A795@pc.twcny.rr.com>

> Actually given the tiny size of the microwindows setup its more
> interesting
> on non Linux setups. Its a real wonder when your OS is also 32-128K bytes
> like
> eCos/RTEMS
> 
> Tinywidgets stuff really stands to make 'Free software on my washing
> machine'
> a believable prospect.

BINGO !!! The hell with PDAs, I totally agree with Alan's view of were
nano-X has a bitchin future. But then again I'm more inclined to build a
washing machine than a PDA anyway.

On a slightly different topic... I almost had good news for nano-X fans, my
company and friends were a hair away from getting approx 500 nano-X
machines into one of Detroit's auto factories. We won the contract, but
couldn't overthrow the MICROS~1 marketing (FUD) arm, so this one has got to
be on WinCE (yuck). This summer is not going to be quite as enjoyable as I
had hoped. I'm still hopefull that the next project will be a nano-X win
though :)

Gary James
####@####.####
http://home.twcny.rr.com/embedded/



Previous by date: 17 May 2001 03:10:51 -0000 Re: MicroWindows' IPC?, PcHome
Next by date: 17 May 2001 03:10:51 -0000 Re: GTK+ port to nano-X, Gary James
Previous in thread: 17 May 2001 03:10:51 -0000 Re: GnuStep port to nano-X, Alan Cox
Next in thread: 17 May 2001 03:10:51 -0000 Re: GnuStep port to nano-X, Jordan Crouse


Powered by ezmlm-browse 0.20.