nanogui: Re: Reactivate


Previous by date: 11 Jul 2001 14:41:55 -0000 Re: Reactivate, Alex Holden
Next by date: 11 Jul 2001 14:41:55 -0000 Re: Reactivate, John Zulauf
Previous in thread: 11 Jul 2001 14:41:55 -0000 Re: Reactivate, Alex Holden
Next in thread: 11 Jul 2001 14:41:55 -0000 Re: Reactivate, John Zulauf

Subject: Re: [nanogui] Re: Reactivate
From: "Chris Ross" ####@####.####
Date: 11 Jul 2001 14:41:55 -0000
Message-Id: <005801c10a18$3026b320$5e32000a@cadltd.com>

ahhhhhhhhhhhhhh. i getcha :)

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Alex Holden" ####@####.####
To: "Chris Ross" ####@####.####
Cc: "Jeffrey Goddard" ####@####.#### ####@####.####
Sent: Wednesday, July 11, 2001 3:07 PM
Subject: Re: [nanogui] Re: Reactivate


> On Wed, 11 Jul 2001, Chris Ross wrote:
> > VMWare on the other hand emulates *everything* and also passes things
> > like networking back to the host machine - hence why it is slower.
> 
> VMWare doesn't emulate the processor, it virtualises it. It does emulate
> the hardware and a few system instructions. As such it runs faster than an
> emulator, but it will still only run on top of x86. Same with Plex86. Same
> with Mac-On-Linux. A true emulator like Bochs will run on any system it
> has been ported to (which is relatively easy as it is written almost
> completely in C), but runs extremely slowly.
> 
> -- 
> ------- Alex Holden -------
> http://www.linuxhacker.org/
>  http://www.robogeeks.org/
> 
> 


Previous by date: 11 Jul 2001 14:41:55 -0000 Re: Reactivate, Alex Holden
Next by date: 11 Jul 2001 14:41:55 -0000 Re: Reactivate, John Zulauf
Previous in thread: 11 Jul 2001 14:41:55 -0000 Re: Reactivate, Alex Holden
Next in thread: 11 Jul 2001 14:41:55 -0000 Re: Reactivate, John Zulauf


Powered by ezmlm-browse 0.20.