nanogui: nano-X 0.6


Previous by date: 17 Jun 1999 17:59:36 -0000 Re: nano-X 0.6, Chris Ross (Boris)
Next by date: 17 Jun 1999 17:59:36 -0000 Re: nano-X 0.6, Greg Haerr
Previous in thread: 17 Jun 1999 17:59:36 -0000 Re: nano-X 0.6, Chris Ross (Boris)
Next in thread: 17 Jun 1999 17:59:36 -0000 Re: nano-X 0.6, Greg Haerr

Subject: Re: nano-X 0.6
From: Alex Holden ####@####.####
Date: 17 Jun 1999 17:59:36 -0000
Message-Id: <Pine.LNX.4.04.9906171854000.21858-100000@www.linuxhacker.org>

On Thu, 17 Jun 1999, Chris Ross (Boris) wrote:
> in all honesty i dont like the look of mini-windows if ti is a seperat
> way of windowing stuff like gdk+gtk+ then thats fine buit if it's
> integrated into the tree then i think it's a tad bit silly - as it wont
> be the only api.

I thought Nano-win was going to be a widget set implemented on top of
Nano-X too. It at least wants to be optional.

--------------- Linux- the choice of a GNU generation. --------------
: Alex Holden (M1CJD)- Caver, Programmer, Land Rover nut, Radio Ham :
-------------------- http://www.linuxhacker.org/ --------------------


Previous by date: 17 Jun 1999 17:59:36 -0000 Re: nano-X 0.6, Chris Ross (Boris)
Next by date: 17 Jun 1999 17:59:36 -0000 Re: nano-X 0.6, Greg Haerr
Previous in thread: 17 Jun 1999 17:59:36 -0000 Re: nano-X 0.6, Chris Ross (Boris)
Next in thread: 17 Jun 1999 17:59:36 -0000 Re: nano-X 0.6, Greg Haerr


Powered by ezmlm-browse 0.20.