nanogui: NewBie Question : nanogui with Visual C++ ???


Previous by date: 24 Aug 1999 20:16:44 -0000 Re: NewBie Question : nanogui with Visual C++ ???, Yuval Yosef
Next by date: 24 Aug 1999 20:16:44 -0000 Re: NewBie Question : nanogui with Visual C++ ???, Greg Haerr
Previous in thread: 24 Aug 1999 20:16:44 -0000 Re: NewBie Question : nanogui with Visual C++ ???, Yuval Yosef
Next in thread: 24 Aug 1999 20:16:44 -0000 Re: NewBie Question : nanogui with Visual C++ ???, Greg Haerr

Subject: RE: NewBie Question : nanogui with Visual C++ ???
From: Greg Haerr ####@####.####
Date: 24 Aug 1999 20:16:44 -0000
Message-Id: <01BEEE3B.C0B856A0.greg@censoft.com>

On Tuesday, August 24, 1999 1:51 PM, Yuval Yosef ####@####.#### wrote:
: 
: First guys i apologize, i'm so used to win32
: that it totally passed my mind that NT is running nanox_3.exe 
: under WOW, and ofcourse VC++ do not compile 'native dos'.

	Yikes!

: 
: Can some one pls. explain to me what are the obstacles
: compiling it under win32, as i see it the assembly code
: can be inlined using the __asm directive, so do we still need
: MASM ? is something in nanogui architecture tied to 16 bit ?

	Why the heck would you want to compile it under Win32?? 
The whole purpose of MicroWindows was to emulate win32 on other systems!!

There's no architecture problems, the code runs on 16 bit ELKS and
16 bit MSDOS and 32 bit Linux.  The asm's just there to do dirty
deeds that C can't always do.

Greg



Previous by date: 24 Aug 1999 20:16:44 -0000 Re: NewBie Question : nanogui with Visual C++ ???, Yuval Yosef
Next by date: 24 Aug 1999 20:16:44 -0000 Re: NewBie Question : nanogui with Visual C++ ???, Greg Haerr
Previous in thread: 24 Aug 1999 20:16:44 -0000 Re: NewBie Question : nanogui with Visual C++ ???, Yuval Yosef
Next in thread: 24 Aug 1999 20:16:44 -0000 Re: NewBie Question : nanogui with Visual C++ ???, Greg Haerr


Powered by ezmlm-browse 0.20.