nanogui: State of the nanogui union?


Previous by date: 29 Sep 1999 12:22:48 -0000 Re: State of the nanogui union?, Alex Holden
Next by date: 29 Sep 1999 12:22:48 -0000 Re: Cleaning up the source trees, Alex Holden
Previous in thread: 29 Sep 1999 12:22:48 -0000 Re: State of the nanogui union?, Alex Holden
Next in thread: 29 Sep 1999 12:22:48 -0000 Re: State of the nanogui union?, Vidar Hokstad

Subject: Re: State of the nanogui union?
From: "Bradley D. LaRonde" ####@####.####
Date: 29 Sep 1999 12:22:48 -0000
Message-Id: <003701bf0a74$593c6e80$b8119526@ltc.com>

----- Original Message -----
From: Vidar Hokstad ####@####.####
To: Alex Holden ####@####.####
Cc: ####@####.####
Sent: Wednesday, September 29, 1999 3:25 AM
Subject: Re: State of the nanogui union?


> On Tue, 28 Sep 1999 20:28:23 +0100 (GMT) you wrote:
> >On 28 Sep 1999, Vidar Hokstad wrote:
> >> I've been working on a widget set, and I'd be happy to share it with
> >> people here. It's based on code I got from Alexander Pleuchert, but not
> >> much of his original code is left at this time, though :-)
> >
> >Excellent. What features does it support? How large is it?
>
> It's a bit primitive right now. It has sliders (horisontal, vertical, or
> both at the same time, settable with a flag :), buttons, radiobuttons,
> toggle buttons, and a primitive text field. It's very object oriented,
> via some C macro hackery.

Everyone one: please brace yourselves for this next question.  :-)

How about C++ instead of macro hackery?

Brad ducks.  :-)

Regards,
Brad


Previous by date: 29 Sep 1999 12:22:48 -0000 Re: State of the nanogui union?, Alex Holden
Next by date: 29 Sep 1999 12:22:48 -0000 Re: Cleaning up the source trees, Alex Holden
Previous in thread: 29 Sep 1999 12:22:48 -0000 Re: State of the nanogui union?, Alex Holden
Next in thread: 29 Sep 1999 12:22:48 -0000 Re: State of the nanogui union?, Vidar Hokstad


Powered by ezmlm-browse 0.20.