nanogui: State of the nanogui union?


Previous by date: 29 Sep 1999 18:06:15 -0000 Re: NanoGUI palette model, Bradley D. LaRonde
Next by date: 29 Sep 1999 18:06:15 -0000 Re: NanoGUI palette model, Greg Haerr
Previous in thread: 29 Sep 1999 18:06:15 -0000 Re: State of the nanogui union?, Greg Haerr
Next in thread: 29 Sep 1999 18:06:15 -0000 Re: State of the nanogui union?, Greg Haerr

Subject: RE: State of the nanogui union?
From: Greg Haerr ####@####.####
Date: 29 Sep 1999 18:06:15 -0000
Message-Id: <01BF0A71.E1BA5310.greg@censoft.com>

 Few C++ programmers seem to realize how to
: use the string class efficiently, for instance - I've seen programs where
: more than 50% of the time was spent concatenating and copying strings 
: because they didn't realize how string expressions were compiled.

	OK - I've got to jump in now, since this is one of my pet peeves.
I think that one of the biggest problems with most programmers is that
they don't know the code that's being produced from their source.  In most
instances, C++ just compounds the problem, exactly as stated above, by
programmers causing riduculous memory and cpu usage for just string
manipulation, for instance.

Previous by date: 29 Sep 1999 18:06:15 -0000 Re: NanoGUI palette model, Bradley D. LaRonde
Next by date: 29 Sep 1999 18:06:15 -0000 Re: NanoGUI palette model, Greg Haerr
Previous in thread: 29 Sep 1999 18:06:15 -0000 Re: State of the nanogui union?, Greg Haerr
Next in thread: 29 Sep 1999 18:06:15 -0000 Re: State of the nanogui union?, Greg Haerr


Powered by ezmlm-browse 0.20.