nanogui: Request for comments - Microwindows


Previous by date: 5 Oct 1999 00:25:57 -0000 Re: Request for comments - Microwindows, Bradley D. LaRonde
Next by date: 5 Oct 1999 00:25:57 -0000 Re: Stupid licensing thread (Was: Request for comments - Microwindows), Greg Haerr
Previous in thread: 5 Oct 1999 00:25:57 -0000 Re: Request for comments - Microwindows, Bradley D. LaRonde
Next in thread: 5 Oct 1999 00:25:57 -0000 Re: Request for comments - Microwindows, Vidar Hokstad

Subject: RE: Request for comments - Microwindows
From: Greg Haerr ####@####.####
Date: 5 Oct 1999 00:25:57 -0000
Message-Id: <01BF0E95.94D6BC00.greg@censoft.com>

: > We'd have to seperate the code which requires David's public domain
: > license into seperate files to the code which is under MPL though.
: 
: That is good practice. David wanted his original code to be totally
: free. Lets make it easy for people to use it that way

Alan, I thought you said that nano-X/microwindows was a derivative work,
and thus another license can be put upon it.  David's code has no restrictions
on derivative works, as long as his copyright remains intact.  Alex, your and my
revisions are completely new work.  We are debating a [L][GM]PL license
for the derivative work.

	So - we don't _have_ to separate any code.  David's original
code is available on Alex's and my ftp server.  Correct?


Previous by date: 5 Oct 1999 00:25:57 -0000 Re: Request for comments - Microwindows, Bradley D. LaRonde
Next by date: 5 Oct 1999 00:25:57 -0000 Re: Stupid licensing thread (Was: Request for comments - Microwindows), Greg Haerr
Previous in thread: 5 Oct 1999 00:25:57 -0000 Re: Request for comments - Microwindows, Bradley D. LaRonde
Next in thread: 5 Oct 1999 00:25:57 -0000 Re: Request for comments - Microwindows, Vidar Hokstad


Powered by ezmlm-browse 0.20.