nanogui: Request for comments - Microwindows


Previous by date: 5 Oct 1999 19:05:43 -0000 Re: Licensing summary, Greg Haerr
Next by date: 5 Oct 1999 19:05:43 -0000 Licensing summary, Greg Haerr
Previous in thread: 5 Oct 1999 19:05:43 -0000 Re: Request for comments - Microwindows, Louis P. Santillan
Next in thread: 5 Oct 1999 19:05:43 -0000 Re: Request for comments - Microwindows, Darran D. Rimron

Subject: Re: Request for comments - Microwindows
From: Alex Holden ####@####.####
Date: 5 Oct 1999 19:05:43 -0000
Message-Id: <Pine.LNX.4.04.9910051945420.376-100000@hyperspace>

On Tue, 5 Oct 1999, Alan Cox wrote:
> This is going on far too long and round in circles. Greg and Alex - pick
> something, stick a license on it all , say so publically and be done. It
> does more harm now than whichever is picked

Right, I vote for MPL with a "convert to GPL/LGPL" option, with David's
original code retaining it's current Public Domain license. Vidar has
already said he's happy with that. Greg?

--------------- Linux- the choice of a GNU generation. --------------
: Alex Holden (M1CJD)- Caver, Programmer, Land Rover nut, Radio Ham :
-------------------- http://www.linuxhacker.org/ --------------------


Previous by date: 5 Oct 1999 19:05:43 -0000 Re: Licensing summary, Greg Haerr
Next by date: 5 Oct 1999 19:05:43 -0000 Licensing summary, Greg Haerr
Previous in thread: 5 Oct 1999 19:05:43 -0000 Re: Request for comments - Microwindows, Louis P. Santillan
Next in thread: 5 Oct 1999 19:05:43 -0000 Re: Request for comments - Microwindows, Darran D. Rimron


Powered by ezmlm-browse 0.20.