nanogui: Request for comments - Microwindows


Previous by date: 5 Oct 1999 21:58:34 -0000 Re: Request for comments - Microwindows, Alex Holden
Next by date: 5 Oct 1999 21:58:34 -0000 Re: Windows in Windows - debate, Alex Holden
Previous in thread: 5 Oct 1999 21:58:34 -0000 Re: Request for comments - Microwindows, Alex Holden
Next in thread: 5 Oct 1999 21:58:34 -0000 Re: Request for comments - Microwindows, Darran D. Rimron

Subject: RE: Request for comments - Microwindows
From: Alex Holden ####@####.####
Date: 5 Oct 1999 21:58:34 -0000
Message-Id: <Pine.LNX.4.04.9910051941570.376-100000@hyperspace>

On Tue, 5 Oct 1999, Louis P. Santillan wrote:
> The restrictions of not being able to produce a binary w/o code/obj files
> has already been mentioned as a restriction.  BSD is an attractive way of
> getting around it.  As far as I know, Allegro has never been truly PD.
> Formally Swapware or at least give me a copy of your autoexec.bat and now
> Giftware or add something to the code base if you use it and if you can.
> In a sense, Allegro is PD...but not completely free.

As I said, it is now. Get the latest version (3.12), read the license.
I believe Shawn decided to abandon the original "swapware" license as it
was needlessly preventing Allegro's use in some situations.

--------------- Linux- the choice of a GNU generation. --------------
: Alex Holden (M1CJD)- Caver, Programmer, Land Rover nut, Radio Ham :
-------------------- http://www.linuxhacker.org/ --------------------



Previous by date: 5 Oct 1999 21:58:34 -0000 Re: Request for comments - Microwindows, Alex Holden
Next by date: 5 Oct 1999 21:58:34 -0000 Re: Windows in Windows - debate, Alex Holden
Previous in thread: 5 Oct 1999 21:58:34 -0000 Re: Request for comments - Microwindows, Alex Holden
Next in thread: 5 Oct 1999 21:58:34 -0000 Re: Request for comments - Microwindows, Darran D. Rimron


Powered by ezmlm-browse 0.20.