nanogui: Re: [linuxce-devel] Re: Microwindows plans
Subject:
Re: [linuxce-devel] Re: Microwindows plans
From:
Ben Pfaff ####@####.####
Date:
12 Oct 1999 02:32:06 -0000
Message-Id: <87k8otiac7.fsf@pfaffben.user.msu.edu>
"Bradley D. LaRonde" ####@####.#### writes:
> > Yes. It's MPL with a convert-to-GPL option (apart from David's original
> > code, which is PD).
>
> Looks like Ben's BOGL code is GPLed. In order to use that our project will
> need a GPL license, so I think that means dual MPL/GPL instead of
> convertible. Comments?
As I stated before, I'm willing to relicense BOGL. Is MPL with
convert-to-GPL the license that NanoGUI is definitely under now? If
so, I'll issue a new license.
--
"Unix... is not so much a product
as it is a painstakingly compiled oral history
of the hacker subculture."
--Neal Stephenson
