nanogui: Thread: Re: [linuxce-devel] Re: Microwindows/Nano-X version 0.87pre1 rele

> a 24 bit malloc (I know, huge) in the case that everything is running
> on Linux for speed.  One trick, used by Xlib, is to split any Copy/Read/Area
> large rectangle into smaller rectangles and make smaller requests for
> each.  Perhaps we should go that route.  How big should nanogui think
> a large buffer is?  Whatever is sent by the server handshake?

For some stuff - embedded boxes, linux 8086 then yes using smaller chunks
might be a good idea. On Linux8086 512 bytes is a lot of data, on embedded
boxes 32K might be a 'lot' 

Alan