gnupic: Status
Subject:
Re: Status
From:
Michael Shiloh ####@####.####
Date:
5 Feb 2001 05:22:33 -0000
Message-Id: <Pine.LNX.4.10.10102042135340.8237-100000@michael.channeldot.com>
incredible work!
Many thanks to Scott, Craig, and Ralf
Michael
.~. /"\ /\ Michael Shiloh
/V\ \ / /\ \ ####@####.####
/( )\ X / \-- (415) 346-2270 x 121
^^-^^ / \ ----
On Sun, 4 Feb 2001, Scott Dattalo wrote:
>
> It may seem quiet, but it ain't.
>
> Craig, Ralf and I are all busily hacking away. As said in the gpasm-0.9.0
> release, Craig would be adding a disassembler to gpasm. He has done this and in
> addition, he's merged the vc (view cod file) utility in there as
> well. Furthermore he's been enhancing the documentation.
>
> Ralf has been adding Profiling to gpsim. This is something I've wanted for a
> long time. It looks like I've waited long enough! He's also improved the trace
> viewer (by making it faster). This is going to be really useful.
>
> I've been working on the PIC port of SDCC. The pcode infrastructure that was put
> into place has been refined (a euphimism for "it wasn't good enough to begin
> with, so I had to redo it"). Most of the regression testing programs now compile
> with the pcode logic. The next step is the pcode optimization. (pcode is the
> term I've given to "post code" as opposed to "intermediate code" (icode)
> generation. The SDCC engine produces icode, the pic port turns this into pcode
> and then ultimately into assembly.)
>
> Scott
>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: ####@####.####
> For additional commands, e-mail: ####@####.####
>
