gnupic: Re: [gnupic] cvs updates


Previous by date: 11 Mar 2006 19:02:49 +0000 Re: [gnupic] cvs updates, Jeff
Next by date: 11 Mar 2006 19:02:49 +0000 Re: [gnupic] cvs updates, Borut Razem
Previous in thread: 11 Mar 2006 19:02:49 +0000 Re: [gnupic] cvs updates, Jeff
Next in thread: 11 Mar 2006 19:02:49 +0000 Re: [gnupic] cvs updates, Borut Razem

Subject: Re: [gnupic] cvs updates
From: Alex Holden ####@####.####
Date: 11 Mar 2006 19:02:49 +0000
Message-Id: <3390BFAF-55EB-4A3D-96A8-6DEE211991CA@linuxhacker.org>

On 11 Mar 2006, at 17:55, Scott Dattalo wrote:
> SF recently announced support for SubVersion. Does anyone know if  
> those
> servers are more reliable? If so, should we consider moving over? I  
> know
> one benefit is that there's no 3 or 4 hour delay between the developer
> repository and the public repository.

I like Subversion and use it locally for all my own projects, but I  
don't know anything about the reliability of Sourceforge's Subversion  
servers.

-- 
------------ Alex Holden - http://www.alexholden.net/ ------------
If it doesn't work, you're not hitting it with a big enough hammer



Previous by date: 11 Mar 2006 19:02:49 +0000 Re: [gnupic] cvs updates, Jeff
Next by date: 11 Mar 2006 19:02:49 +0000 Re: [gnupic] cvs updates, Borut Razem
Previous in thread: 11 Mar 2006 19:02:49 +0000 Re: [gnupic] cvs updates, Jeff
Next in thread: 11 Mar 2006 19:02:49 +0000 Re: [gnupic] cvs updates, Borut Razem


Powered by ezmlm-browse 0.20.