gnupic: Re: [gnupic] GCC port for PIC


Previous by date: 5 Apr 2006 12:50:02 +0100 Re: [gnupic] GCC port for PIC, Colm O' Flaherty
Next by date: 5 Apr 2006 12:50:02 +0100 Re: [gnupic] GCC port for PIC, Colm O' Flaherty
Previous in thread: 5 Apr 2006 12:50:02 +0100 Re: [gnupic] GCC port for PIC, Colm O' Flaherty
Next in thread: 5 Apr 2006 12:50:02 +0100 Re: [gnupic] GCC port for PIC, Colm O' Flaherty

Subject: Re: [gnupic] GCC port for PIC
From: Alex Holden ####@####.####
Date: 5 Apr 2006 12:50:02 +0100
Message-Id: <B839014E-CEFB-4793-B33B-B79F0206D00A@linuxhacker.org>

On 5 Apr 2006, at 12:31, Colm O' Flaherty wrote:
>> If they haven't used any  GPLed code to create their library then  
>> the GPL doesn't apply to it.  Bundling gcc and their C library  
>> into one package is simply aggregation.
> I just don't follow that logic at all.. It seems to completely  
> ignore the GPL clause that says the following  (How the  
> distribution happens seems to be the key).
> <quote>
> These requirements apply to the modified work as a whole.

You seem to be interpreting "the modified work as a whole" to mean  
the installer (zipfile, tarball, whatever) and everything contained  
in it. I disagree. The "modified work as a whole" in this case is  
simply GCC, not the other libraries and programs that Microchip have  
bundled with it.

-- 
------------ Alex Holden - http://www.alexholden.net/ ------------
If it doesn't work, you're not hitting it with a big enough hammer



Previous by date: 5 Apr 2006 12:50:02 +0100 Re: [gnupic] GCC port for PIC, Colm O' Flaherty
Next by date: 5 Apr 2006 12:50:02 +0100 Re: [gnupic] GCC port for PIC, Colm O' Flaherty
Previous in thread: 5 Apr 2006 12:50:02 +0100 Re: [gnupic] GCC port for PIC, Colm O' Flaherty
Next in thread: 5 Apr 2006 12:50:02 +0100 Re: [gnupic] GCC port for PIC, Colm O' Flaherty


Powered by ezmlm-browse 0.20.