gnupic: Status on enhanced 14-bit instruction set


Previous by date: 12 Feb 2010 23:48:13 -0000 Re: Status on enhanced 14-bit instruction set, David
Next by date: 12 Feb 2010 23:48:13 -0000 Re: Status on enhanced 14-bit instruction set, Joseph.Julicher.microchip.com
Previous in thread: 12 Feb 2010 23:48:13 -0000 Re: Status on enhanced 14-bit instruction set, David
Next in thread: 12 Feb 2010 23:48:13 -0000 Re: Status on enhanced 14-bit instruction set, Joseph.Julicher.microchip.com

Subject: Re: Status on enhanced 14-bit instruction set
From: Tamas Rudnai ####@####.####
Date: 12 Feb 2010 23:48:13 -0000
Message-Id: <492f1421002121548s6ef661f2ha355ccb6bbaea7e@mail.gmail.com>

Hi Joseph,

That is something very new I have learnt just now. I was surprised
that you modified GPASM instead of MPASM for these tests -- hopoe they
will not burn you because of telling this us :-)

Anyway, why Microchip does not switch to GPASM if you guys are using
that as a primary platform for developing your product? ;-) It seems
to me that it is a double work to implement something to GPASM and
then to MPASM too...

Thanks,
Tamas



On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 10:05 PM,  ####@####.#### wrote:
> I added the enhanced instruction set to GPASM 2 years ago when we were
> defining the instruction set.  I passed the modifications on to the
> list.
>
> I can provide the version (old) of GPASM that we used to generate code
> for the chip simulations.
>
> Joseph Julicher
> Applications Manager
> Microchip Technology, Inc.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Roger Dellor ####@####.####
> Sent: Friday, February 12, 2010 2:23 PM
> To: ####@####.####
> Subject: Status on enhanced 14-bit instruction set
>
>
>
>
> I'm beginning to write assembler code for the p16f1827 (and new to this
> list).  I have version 0.13.7, which I believe is the latest, and it
> does not
> support this part.  So, to get started, I'm pretending that I have a
> 16f1933, and modifying the 16f1933.inc file to reflect the 1827.  If I
> can't
> get a 16f1827.inc file from Microchip - the request is pending - I can
> write
> my own, but gpasm does not appear to recognize the enhanced
> instruction set which I would like to use.
>
> So, if I'm not doing something wrong, does anyone know when gpasm
> will support the extra instructions in the enhanced instruction set.
>
> Thanks
>
> Roger
>
> --
>
>
> cell   650 823-5307
> home   650 969-8227
> e-mail ####@####.####
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: ####@####.####
> For additional commands, e-mail: ####@####.####
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: ####@####.####
> For additional commands, e-mail: ####@####.####
>
>



-- 
int main() { char *a,*s,*q; printf(s="int main() { char *a,*s,*q;
printf(s=%s%s%s, q=%s%s%s%s,s,q,q,a=%s%s%s%s,q,q,q,a,a,q); }",
q="\"",s,q,q,a="\\",q,q,q,a,a,q); }

Previous by date: 12 Feb 2010 23:48:13 -0000 Re: Status on enhanced 14-bit instruction set, David
Next by date: 12 Feb 2010 23:48:13 -0000 Re: Status on enhanced 14-bit instruction set, Joseph.Julicher.microchip.com
Previous in thread: 12 Feb 2010 23:48:13 -0000 Re: Status on enhanced 14-bit instruction set, David
Next in thread: 12 Feb 2010 23:48:13 -0000 Re: Status on enhanced 14-bit instruction set, Joseph.Julicher.microchip.com


Powered by ezmlm-browse 0.20.