gnupic: some question about the directive GLOBAL in the source code.


Previous by date: 17 Aug 2012 07:12:09 -0000 Re: some question about the directive GLOBAL in the source code., feqin fan
Next by date: 17 Aug 2012 07:12:09 -0000 Re: some question about the directive GLOBAL in the source code., feqin fan
Previous in thread: 17 Aug 2012 07:12:09 -0000 Re: some question about the directive GLOBAL in the source code., feqin fan
Next in thread: 17 Aug 2012 07:12:09 -0000 Re: some question about the directive GLOBAL in the source code., feqin fan

Subject: Re: some question about the directive GLOBAL in the source code.
From: Tamas Rudnai ####@####.####
Date: 17 Aug 2012 07:12:09 -0000
Message-Id: <CAJLb5+R-ueNq4HXk0phGh1Ln2VM=xKe3uGXbbsSqEcW0+kK4vg@mail.gmail.com>

No worries with your English :-) So you mean must be processed by the
assembler (compiler), right?

I think I got you. Are you claiming that the compiler is not working
properly and when a 'global' directive is used before declaring the
variable, it should create the symbol in the symbol table as opposed to
return with 'no symbol' ? In this case I think you are right.

How it works in gpuitls -- I do not know, I have not looked at the source
code yet. Hope someone is seeing this who does and can help you with
debugging the compiler's source.

Tamas




On 16 August 2012 23:24, feqin fan ####@####.#### wrote:

> My english writing is poor, Maybe it misled you, Sorry , It’s my fault.
>
>
>
> I’m here discussing the assembler source code’s behavior, Not CPU’s
> behavior.
>
> the directive “global var” must be executed by assembler.
>
> and in line 5,the function maybe_evaluate_concat() does not to query symbol
> table, it just do some macro process, and must be return the string “var”.
>
>
> Thanks for you letter..
>
> :-)
>
>
>
> 2012/8/17 Tamas Rudnai ####@####.####
>
> > The "global var" will never be "executed" as that is not an instruction
> but
> > a directive. But that is not important right now.
> >
> > What is important that although I have never looked at the full source
> code
> > and therefore not sure what are those functions and macros doing there,
> but
> > following your logic in the comments, the "p will point to var" in line
> 5.
> > Now if var is unknown at that stage, then maybe p will be NULL, right? So
> > because of the condition at line 6, the compiler will never make it to
> the
> > line 7... Just my cents.
> >
> > Tamas
> >
> >
> >
> > On 15 August 2012 19:50, feqin fan ####@####.#### wrote:
> >
> > > because the symbol_table stTop have nothing about symbol "var", the
> > source
> > > line "global var" is first line executed by assembler.
> > >
> > > all of this are my inferences.
> > >
> > > :-)
> > >
> > > THX..
> > >
> > > 2012/8/16 Holger Oehm ####@####.####
> > >
> > > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> > > > Hash: SHA1
> > > >
> > > > On 14.08.2012 12:35, feqin fan wrote:
> > > > > Hello, everybody, I'm sorry to trouble you again.
> > > > >     I have read most of the source code of gputils. I have a query
> > > about
> > > > > the implementation of the directive GLOBAL.
> > > > >     for example, Have this code:
> > > > >
> > > > >     global var
> > > > >
> > > > >     udata
> > > > > var    res 1
> > > > >
> > > > > the assembler deal with the first line "global var",
> > > > > the calling sequence is like this : yyparse() -
> > do_or_append_insn(char
> > > *,
> > > > > struct pnode *) - do_insn(char *, struct pnode *) - do_global()
> > > > >     the function do_global() source code :
> > > > >
> > > > > 1,    if (state.mode == absolute) {
> > > > > 2,        gperror(GPE_OBJECT_ONLY, NULL);
> > > > > 3,    } else {
> > > > > 4,        for (; parms; parms = TAIL(parms)) {
> > > > > 5,            p = maybe_evaluate_concat(HEAD(parms));    //p will
> > point
> > > > to
> > > > > "var".
> > > > > 6,        if (p) {
> > > > > 7,            s = get_symbol(state.stTop, p);    //s will be NULL
> > > > > 8,            if (s == NULL) {
> > > > > 9,                snprintf(buf,
> > > > > 10,                     sizeof(buf),
> > > > > 11                      "Symbol not previously defined (%s).",
> > > > > 12,                     p);
> > > > > 13,             gperror(GPE_NOSYM, buf);
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > the line 4 must be first executed, in line 5 the p will point to
> > "var".
> > > > and
> > > > > in line 7, because the source code "global var" is the first line
> of
> > > the
> > > > > being assembled code.
> > > > > So. in the function do_global() line 7, the s will be NULL,
> > > >
> > > > And why exactly should s be NULL after the assignment in line 7???
> > > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> > > > Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
> > > > Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
> > > >
> > > > iEYEARECAAYFAlAr48sACgkQHdk+97UOUanAAgCfYSdqul+vqfA3ARzB38GScQGT
> > > > 8lUAoIVHttJ6BOx1WLJCph25B4ak3+dN
> > > > =N8FO
> > > > -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> > > >
> > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: ####@####.####
> > > > For additional commands, e-mail: ####@####.####
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > int main() { char *a,*s,*q; printf(s="int main() { char *a,*s,*q;
> > printf(s=%s%s%s, q=%s%s%s%s,s,q,q,a=%s%s%s%s,q,q,q,a,a,q); }",
> > q="\"",s,q,q,a="\\",q,q,q,a,a,q); }
> >
>



-- 
int main() { char *a,*s,*q; printf(s="int main() { char *a,*s,*q;
printf(s=%s%s%s, q=%s%s%s%s,s,q,q,a=%s%s%s%s,q,q,q,a,a,q); }",
q="\"",s,q,q,a="\\",q,q,q,a,a,q); }

Previous by date: 17 Aug 2012 07:12:09 -0000 Re: some question about the directive GLOBAL in the source code., feqin fan
Next by date: 17 Aug 2012 07:12:09 -0000 Re: some question about the directive GLOBAL in the source code., feqin fan
Previous in thread: 17 Aug 2012 07:12:09 -0000 Re: some question about the directive GLOBAL in the source code., feqin fan
Next in thread: 17 Aug 2012 07:12:09 -0000 Re: some question about the directive GLOBAL in the source code., feqin fan


Powered by ezmlm-browse 0.20.