[<<] [<] Page 1 of 1 [>] [>>] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subject:
Re:Specifying processor header file in Makefile/commandline with gpasm
in --mpasm-compatible mode
From: Joe Pfeiffer ####@####.#### Date: 20 Dec 2014 16:19:58 -0000 Message-Id: <21653.41386.591144.121763@pfeifferfamily.net> I use a processor directive in my source file instead of the -p option. This would let you define a symbol on the command line, and then reference the symbol both in the processor directive and in the include statement. Kustaa Nyholm writes: >In working with this code: > >http://www.diolan.com/pic/bootloader_dwn.html > >all the .asm files include the processor specific header with: > > #include "P18F4455.INC" > >now I would to specify the header in my Makefile so that >I don't need to edit all those files when I use a different >processor. > >So what is the recommended way to handle this? > >I can of course specify the header as a symbol defined >on the command line that invokes the assembler but >since I already (need to) specify the processor on >the command line this seems redundant and thus wrong. > >br Kusti > > >--------------------------------------------------------------------- >To unsubscribe, e-mail: ####@####.#### >For additional commands, e-mail: ####@####.#### > -- Joseph J. Pfeiffer, Jr., Ph.D. http://pfeifferfamily.net/ 1440 Tierra del Sol Dr 575.525.2764 (H) Las Cruces, NM 88007 575.496.3501 (C) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
[<<] [<] Page 1 of 1 [>] [>>] |