nanogui: THREADSAFE and NONETWORK


Previous by date: 14 Dec 2005 21:35:13 +0000 THREADSAFE and NONETWORK, Alexander Neundorf
Next by date: 14 Dec 2005 21:35:13 +0000 short introduction to shared memory support ?, Alexander Neundorf
Previous in thread: 14 Dec 2005 21:35:13 +0000 THREADSAFE and NONETWORK, Alexander Neundorf
Next in thread: 14 Dec 2005 21:35:13 +0000 Re: THREADSAFE and NONETWORK, Greg Haerr

Subject: Re: [nanogui] THREADSAFE and NONETWORK
From: Alexander Neundorf ####@####.####
Date: 14 Dec 2005 21:35:13 +0000
Message-Id: <200512142235.00890.neundorf@kde.org>

On Wednesday 14 December 2005 22:20, Alexander Neundorf wrote:
> Hi,
>
> short question: which effect have these two defines ?
> IOW, if everything runs in one process space, but in multiple threads, I
> guess both NONETWORK and THREADSAFE are required. Why is THREADSAFE
> translated to THREADSAFE_LINUX in lock.h ?
>
> #if THREADSAFE
> #define THREADSAFE_LINUX	1	/* use linux threadsafe routines*/
> #endif

And does it have to be a recursive mutex ? Or does a "normal" one suffice ?

Alex
-- 
Work: ####@####.#### - http://www.jenoptik-los.de
Home: ####@####.####                - http://www.kde.org
      ####@####.####               - http://www.neundorf.net

Previous by date: 14 Dec 2005 21:35:13 +0000 THREADSAFE and NONETWORK, Alexander Neundorf
Next by date: 14 Dec 2005 21:35:13 +0000 short introduction to shared memory support ?, Alexander Neundorf
Previous in thread: 14 Dec 2005 21:35:13 +0000 THREADSAFE and NONETWORK, Alexander Neundorf
Next in thread: 14 Dec 2005 21:35:13 +0000 Re: THREADSAFE and NONETWORK, Greg Haerr


Powered by ezmlm-browse 0.20.