nanogui: Microwindows font needed - terminal 8x12
Subject:
Re: Microwindows font needed - terminal 8x12
From:
"Louis P. Santillan" ####@####.####
Date:
18 Oct 1999 18:30:45 -0000
Message-Id: <Pine.GSO.4.10.9910181118140.25141-100000@neptune.calstatela.edu>
You may also choose to consider using FPU to do copying 80 bits at a time
:). This is something that is _possible_ even on 8088/8086 machines w/an
8087 and compatible on x86's w/FPU. I believe Paul Hsieh of clax also
mentioned that MMX memcpy work well when carefully aligned but that would
be out of the scope of ELKS's goal. However, a 80 bit memcpy on a 286/386
could produce a significant boost in speed.
Louis
------------------------------------------------------------------
"If a frog had wings, he wouldn't bump his a$$ when he hopped!"
- Red Foreman of That '70s Show
On Mon, 18 Oct 1999, Greg Haerr wrote:
> I have completed work this weekend by adding full-blown bitblitting
> to Microwindows. To celebrate, other than now having the 3d demo
> not flicker, I decided to write a scrolling terminal emulator, which
> requires bitblit for the scrolling.
>
> So we now have another microwindows demo, which can be convieniently
> used to actually run programs from within microwindows. (no, I didn't
> finish the escape sequence processing, nor do I yet implement running
> new programs in a window, but I will). A screenshot is available at
>
> ftp://microwindows.censoft.com/pub/microwindows/ScreenShots/microwin3.gif
>
>
> Anyway, as you may know, we've written a utility that allows Windows fonts
> to be used, providing you have a Windows license. The windows terminal
> font (8x12) looks _much_ nicer than the font I'm currently using (8x8), so
> I'm wondering if anyone has any nice terminal fonts they'd like to contribute,
> or are already open source. Please send comments.
>
> Greg
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: ####@####.####
> For additional commands, e-mail: ####@####.####
>
>