nanogui: Licensing


Previous by date: 11 May 1999 09:22:21 -0000 Re: NanoX version 0.3 released, Alex Holden
Next by date: 11 May 1999 09:22:21 -0000 Re: NanoX version 0.3 released, Alexander Peuchert
Previous in thread: 11 May 1999 09:22:21 -0000 Re: Licensing, Alexander Peuchert
Next in thread: 11 May 1999 09:22:21 -0000 Re: Licensing, Alexander Peuchert

Subject: Re: Re[2]: Licensing
From: Alex Holden ####@####.####
Date: 11 May 1999 09:22:21 -0000
Message-Id: <Pine.LNX.4.04.9905111020190.11663-100000@www.linuxhacker.org>

On Tue, 11 May 1999, Alexander Peuchert wrote:
> On Tue, 11 May 1999, Alex Holden wrote:
> I just don't want a company to take advantage of our/my productivity
> without giving something back for it. I put something in it and you put
> something in it. That's why it's called free!

Okay, so that leaves the second option, split licensing. Ie. leave the
files containing mini-X code as they are (possibly rewriting them over
time and changing the license when none of the original is left), and put
new code in seperate files under whatever license you want. That shouldn't
be a problem from the GPL perspective, as it allows linking with code
under a less restrictive license.

--------------- Linux- the choice of a GNU generation. --------------
: Alex Holden (M1CJD)- Caver, Programmer, Land Rover nut, Radio Ham :
-------------------- http://www.linuxhacker.org/ --------------------


Previous by date: 11 May 1999 09:22:21 -0000 Re: NanoX version 0.3 released, Alex Holden
Next by date: 11 May 1999 09:22:21 -0000 Re: NanoX version 0.3 released, Alexander Peuchert
Previous in thread: 11 May 1999 09:22:21 -0000 Re: Licensing, Alexander Peuchert
Next in thread: 11 May 1999 09:22:21 -0000 Re: Licensing, Alexander Peuchert


Powered by ezmlm-browse 0.20.