Subject:
Re: [nanogui] GUI design tool for Nano-X?
From:
"celeber2" ####@####.####
Date:
26 Sep 2006 16:56:06 +0100
Message-Id: <00cf01c6e184$3705fdb0$c80aa8c0@ALEX>
Hi Martin,
Thanks for your comment.
But, in my opinion, FLTK, Nxlib and GTK are compatible. So programs can run on all of them, but would be in different style I think. And I think FLTK2.0 is more beautiful than FLTK1.0.7. Since FLTK1.0.7 has been ported to Nano-X then rename to FLNX right now, so I just want to ported FLTK2.0 to Nano-X too.
Any comments?
Alex
----- Original Message -----
From: "Martin Kajdas" ####@####.####
To: "celeber2" ####@####.####
Cc: ####@####.####
Sent: Tuesday, September 26, 2006 11:36 PM
Subject: RE: [nanogui] GUI design tool for Nano-X?
FLTK 1.1.7 programs linked with nxlib-0.45 work fine with nano-X.
I am sure FLTK 2.0 will do the same. If not, you can always modify nxlib to make it so.
Martin
-----Original Message-----
From: celeber2 ####@####.####
Sent: Tuesday, September 26, 2006 8:29 AM
To: Greg Haerr
Cc: ####@####.####
Subject: Re: [nanogui] GUI design tool for Nano-X?
Dear All,
Can anybody help me to answer following questions? Thanks a lot!
Also, I really need the source code of NanoGTK, anyone can send it to me?
Alex
----- Original Message -----
From: "celeber2" ####@####.####
To: "Greg Haerr" ####@####.####
Cc: ####@####.####
Sent: Sunday, September 24, 2006 12:21 PM
Subject: Re: [nanogui] GUI design tool for Nano-X?
> Dear Greg,
>
> I am interesting GUI design tools for Nano-X too.
> 1) I found there are 3 tools available, they are Flnx, nxlib and
> nanoGTK. I can find out the source code of Flnx-0.18 and nxlib-0.45, but
> cannot download the source code of nanoGTK, could you please send it to
> me if convenient?
> 2) Could you please give me a short comment of compared them? Do you
> think which is more powerful and beautiful? :-)
> I found that the widget style of Flnx-0.18 is not so beautiful, but
> Fltk2.0 is very good looking. I don't know what about nxlib, since I
> never compile successful so far, I will try later.
> 3) I am just wondering is it easy to port Fltk2.0 to Nano-X, and could
> you please give me some suggestions?
> BTW, could you please tell me who is the maintainer of Flnx? Maybe I can
> get some helps from he.
> Thanks for your kind help!
>
> Best regards
> Alex
>
>
> On Thu, 2006-09-21 at 18:06 -0600, Greg Haerr wrote:
>> : I found NanoGTK
>> : (http://www.emsoftltd.com/products/listing/nanogtk_content.htm), but it
>> : appears to have been abandoned four years ago. Anybody use it? Any other
>> : alternatives? (Sorry for replying to myself.)
>>
>> Paul -
>>
>> The guys at emsoft put quite a lot of work into nanogtk, and I
>> haven't heard anything since they first announced it... Is their
>> source still available? I pulled down the source some time
>> ago if you need it... IIRC it didn't quite compile as it was
>> missing one header file, which I hacked up fairly quickly.
>>
>> This would be a great project to bring back to life. I didn't
>> place all their patches into Microwindows, but will should
>> anybody get interested in this project. This is because
>> they added quite a few APIs, IIRC.
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Greg
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: ####@####.####
>> For additional commands, e-mail: ####@####.####
>>
>
