nanogui: Is nano-X appropriate for this application?
Subject:
Re: [nanogui] Is nano-X appropriate for this application?
From:
"celeber2" ####@####.####
Date:
3 Oct 2006 17:02:50 +0100
Message-Id: <000c01c6e705$1d242a80$040aa8c0@ALEX>
I think you don't need any GUIs, just directly output frames from webcam to the framebuffer of linux kernel. Nano-X also likes many GUIs on Embedded linux system which output images to framebuffer. So, I think GUIs don't have any help for your webcam unless you really need a GUI for interaction with User. FYR!
Alex
----- Original Message -----
From: "Raph HP" ####@####.####
To: ####@####.####
Sent: Monday, October 02, 2006 11:29 PM
Subject: [nanogui] Is nano-X appropriate for this application?
> Hello,
>
> I just discoverd nano-X...
>
> I have to make an application on an ARM9 where the user must see the output of a webcam. Is nano-X able to display the output of a webcam? Hence, do you think it is the right X-server for me? If not, which one do you suggest me?
>
> Here are some details:
>
> the computer is a microcontroler running an ARM9 with several I/Os (serial, ethernet, 2xUSB, CAN) with shared vga video. The memory is a flash chip of 32Mb and 32Mb of RAM. The Linux runing on this card is a
> 2.6.15 kernel compiled by the manufacturer.
>
> Thanks a lot for any comment or help
>
> raph
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------
> Découvrez un nouveau moyen de poser toutes vos questions quelque soit le sujet ! Yahoo! Questions/Réponses pour partager vos connaissances, vos opinions et vos expériences. Cliquez ici.
