nanogui: X11 vs framebuffer


Previous by date: 30 Jun 2007 22:43:54 +0100 X11 vs framebuffer, Kernel Mojo
Next by date: 30 Jun 2007 22:43:54 +0100 Re: how to cross compile FreeType font freetype1.3.1, Thomas Malkus
Previous in thread: 30 Jun 2007 22:43:54 +0100 X11 vs framebuffer, Kernel Mojo
Next in thread: 30 Jun 2007 22:43:54 +0100 Re: X11 vs framebuffer, Greg Haerr

Subject: AW: [nanogui] X11 vs framebuffer
From: "Thomas Malkus" ####@####.####
Date: 30 Jun 2007 22:43:54 +0100
Message-Id: <000701c7bb5f$b4475750$1cd605f0$@de>

> Can I configure my nanox application to execute on my touchscreen
desktop
> using X11 without the "Microwindows" app frame and mouse pointer
displayed?
> Or must I use a framebuffer device to accomplish this?

In src/config I have disabled the mouse drivers and set NOMOUSE=Y. I
don't
use nanowm and have only one window for the application (flnx) without
frame
and mouse pointer.

Tom 


Previous by date: 30 Jun 2007 22:43:54 +0100 X11 vs framebuffer, Kernel Mojo
Next by date: 30 Jun 2007 22:43:54 +0100 Re: how to cross compile FreeType font freetype1.3.1, Thomas Malkus
Previous in thread: 30 Jun 2007 22:43:54 +0100 X11 vs framebuffer, Kernel Mojo
Next in thread: 30 Jun 2007 22:43:54 +0100 Re: X11 vs framebuffer, Greg Haerr


Powered by ezmlm-browse 0.20.