nanogui: nano-x and mwin
Subject:
nano-x and mwin
From:
Chris Ross ####@####.####
Date:
3 Dec 1999 19:22:39 -0000
Message-Id: <Pine.LNX.4.10.9912031910210.15233-100000@vortex.ukshells.co.uk>
i have been looking throught the source to both of these
and i had an idea - tell me if it's a bad one. i was thinking
that if we made the client libary for nanox have the same
fuinction signitures as that of X we could then have our
opne as nX.h - this wold mean easier proting of apps.
and what would be the feasibilty of having one graphics server
and having 2 client libaries - one that implements the
Xlib replacement and one that is a Win32 replacment?
this would mean the tree is far mor e logical in it's structure.
chris
======================================================
| Chris Ross ( Boris` ) ####@####.#### |
| http://www.darkrock.co.uk |
`----------------------------------------------------'
