nanogui: source tree


Previous by date: 16 Dec 1999 16:44:50 -0000 Re: source tree, Chris Ross
Next by date: 16 Dec 1999 16:44:50 -0000 Nano-X offscreen drawing, Greg Haerr
Previous in thread: 16 Dec 1999 16:44:50 -0000 Re: source tree, Chris Ross
Next in thread: 16 Dec 1999 16:44:50 -0000 Re: source tree, Greg Haerr

Subject: RE: source tree
From: ####@####.#### (Imre Lebr)
Date: 16 Dec 1999 16:44:50 -0000
Message-Id: <199912161639.RAA26867@mach.vub.ac.be>

What about putting the different drivers for the different targets in a
seperate directory?

Imre 


 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Greg Haerr ####@####.####
> > Sent: 15 December 1999 15:42
> > To: Chris Ross
> > Cc: ####@####.####
> > Subject: Re: source tree
> >
> >
> > : i think the source tree needs to be tidied up abit with
> > : a better structure.
> >
> > Yes, I agree.  I plan on having that done for 0.87 final,
> > but I had some submissions (like running on X11) that
> > everyone got excited about, and I decided to integrate
> > them first.
> >
> > Also, Martin has submitted a makefile rewrite
> > that I plan to use in 0.87.  It creates dependencies
> > automatically, and also builds a "make xconfig"
> > that allows different options to be set graphically
> > under X, rather than editing a makefile.  I am
> > looking for a "make config" that does the same
> > thing, like the Linux kernel.
> 
> I've got some makefile changes I have been tweaking about with, and some
> minor modifications on kbd_tty.c (which need my makefile changes, I plan
> to intergrate the changes into kbd_*.c) which I will submit for 0.88 so
> I can backport my makefile mods into Martin's. I have made a "make
> config" which effectivly calls a chunck of C after compiling it and asks
> you questions and fprintf's a makefile.  Hackery but easy.  Again, I'll
> intergrate it with Martin's for '88 if you want?
> 
> > Yes, I may take you up on this.  I'd like to add
> > Martin's submission, and then perhaps you could
> > look at it from the multiple OS perspective.  BTW,
> > does running on Solaris mean not using GNU make?
> 
> No idea about GNU make. It would be easy[1] to write a "makeless" make
> system for systems without make.  "make config" makes a shell script,
> shell script checks modification dates, if files exist, etc.  Easy once,
> a bugger to do if you add/remove/change anything.... Anyone with any
> thoughts? (There must be some other Open Source, Small, Dependancy
> Related "make" system we can steal, anyone?)
> 
> 	-Darran
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: ####@####.####
> For additional commands, e-mail: ####@####.####
> 


Previous by date: 16 Dec 1999 16:44:50 -0000 Re: source tree, Chris Ross
Next by date: 16 Dec 1999 16:44:50 -0000 Nano-X offscreen drawing, Greg Haerr
Previous in thread: 16 Dec 1999 16:44:50 -0000 Re: source tree, Chris Ross
Next in thread: 16 Dec 1999 16:44:50 -0000 Re: source tree, Greg Haerr


Powered by ezmlm-browse 0.20.