nanogui: Microwindow+GTK or FLTK??


Previous by date: 19 May 2009 00:56:07 -0000 Re: Microwindow+GTK or FLTK??, Siji Sunny
Next by date: 19 May 2009 00:56:07 -0000 Re: Microwindow+GTK or FLTK??, Greg Haerr
Previous in thread: 19 May 2009 00:56:07 -0000 Re: Microwindow+GTK or FLTK??, Siji Sunny
Next in thread: 19 May 2009 00:56:07 -0000 Re: Microwindow+GTK or FLTK??, Greg Haerr

Subject: Re: Microwindow+GTK or FLTK??
From: "Aaron J. Grier" ####@####.####
Date: 19 May 2009 00:56:07 -0000
Message-Id: <20090519005557.GJ500@arwen.poofy.goof.com>

On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 11:52:07AM +0530, Siji Sunny wrote:
> I recently start using Microwindows and now want to do lot of
> application development on top of it specially for embedded devices.
> 
> For getting more user friendly GUI's am thinking to use either FTLK or
> GTK.
> 
> So can anybody suggest me which is more compatible with Microwindow.

I believe the preferred method is using the XtoNX.h header, which
translates X calls to nano-X calls.  I have read success reports with
FLTK using this method, and it wouldn't surprise me if GTK works
similarly.

-- 
  Aaron J. Grier | "Not your ordinary poofy goof." | ####@####.####

Previous by date: 19 May 2009 00:56:07 -0000 Re: Microwindow+GTK or FLTK??, Siji Sunny
Next by date: 19 May 2009 00:56:07 -0000 Re: Microwindow+GTK or FLTK??, Greg Haerr
Previous in thread: 19 May 2009 00:56:07 -0000 Re: Microwindow+GTK or FLTK??, Siji Sunny
Next in thread: 19 May 2009 00:56:07 -0000 Re: Microwindow+GTK or FLTK??, Greg Haerr


Powered by ezmlm-browse 0.20.