nanogui: Microwindow+GTK or FLTK??


Previous by date: 19 May 2009 23:24:39 -0000 Re: Microwindow+GTK or FLTK??, Greg Haerr
Next by date: 19 May 2009 23:24:39 -0000 unicode flags, Bajimohanreddy Bandi
Previous in thread: 19 May 2009 23:24:39 -0000 Re: Microwindow+GTK or FLTK??, Greg Haerr
Next in thread: 19 May 2009 23:24:39 -0000 Re: Microwindow+GTK or FLTK??, Greg Haerr

Subject: Re: [nanogui] Re: Microwindow+GTK or FLTK??
From: "Aaron J. Grier" ####@####.####
Date: 19 May 2009 23:24:39 -0000
Message-Id: <20090519232427.GM500@arwen.poofy.goof.com>

On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 04:02:33PM -0600, Greg Haerr wrote:
> > does nano-X provide X headers proper, or are these "borrowed" from
> > the host installation?
> 
> It was decided that the X headers should be supplied by the installed
> X11, or from X11 source.  In this way, NXLIB is built to match the
> existing X11 installation, thus requiring no recompile of X11
> application binaries on the target platform.

this only works if the host and target are binary compatible, which
isn't always the case.  in my case host is running Linux (or some other
unix) and the target is running RTEMS.  (RTEMS does not currently have a
native X11 port.)

do you have any suggestions for porting third-party graphics toolkits
(Qt, FLTK, etc) in this situation other than a direct-to-nano-X port?

-- 
  Aaron J. Grier | "Not your ordinary poofy goof." | ####@####.####

Previous by date: 19 May 2009 23:24:39 -0000 Re: Microwindow+GTK or FLTK??, Greg Haerr
Next by date: 19 May 2009 23:24:39 -0000 unicode flags, Bajimohanreddy Bandi
Previous in thread: 19 May 2009 23:24:39 -0000 Re: Microwindow+GTK or FLTK??, Greg Haerr
Next in thread: 19 May 2009 23:24:39 -0000 Re: Microwindow+GTK or FLTK??, Greg Haerr


Powered by ezmlm-browse 0.20.