nanogui: Overloading the nano-X server
Subject:
Re: Overloading the nano-X server
From:
"Aaron J. Grier" ####@####.####
Date:
10 Nov 2009 04:40:10 -0000
Message-Id: <20091110043418.GB2041@arwen.poofy.goof.com>
On Mon, Nov 09, 2009 at 04:53:55PM -0700, Steven Vahl wrote:
> * Is there a way for the client to find out somehow if the server is
> still working on a previous GrPoly command? If so, then the client
> could just "drop" any datasets that come in until the server and
> display had completed the one they were working on, preventing the
> server from becoming overloaded.
try adding a call to GrFlush() after the call to GrPoly(). that will
keep the commands from stacking up.
> * Is there some other approach I could use to plot the data that would
> be faster?
the line draw routines in nano-X have a large potential for optimization
by moving line draw to the driver level. how much work do you want to
do to speed this up?
--
Aaron J. Grier | "Not your ordinary poofy goof." | ####@####.####
