nanogui: Overloading the nano-X server


Previous by date: 11 Nov 2009 22:22:48 -0000 Re: Overloading the nano-X server, Greg Haerr
Next by date: 11 Nov 2009 22:22:48 -0000 Re: Overloading the nano-X server, Steven Vahl
Previous in thread: 11 Nov 2009 22:22:48 -0000 Re: Overloading the nano-X server, Greg Haerr
Next in thread: 11 Nov 2009 22:22:48 -0000 Re: Overloading the nano-X server, Steven Vahl

Subject: Re: [nanogui] AW: Overloading the nano-X server
From: "Greg Haerr" ####@####.####
Date: 11 Nov 2009 22:22:48 -0000
Message-Id: <0a7101ca631d$35146190$0300a8c0@RDP>

> I would try to collect the data in an additional thread.
> The drawing can be done later with the normal gui thread.

If this method were used to collect data, and GrFlush(),
follwed by a Gr operation requiring a client read (like
GrGetWindowInfo) were done in the gui thread, then
the ratio of time spent collect versus plotting might be
roughly approximated.  This could then be used to 
schedule how much data was sent to the server.
It could then be optimized be sending more graphics
commands per collect/GrFlush() cycle, and elimnating
the read operation, in the event it was more important 
to stay with the most recently collected data.

Regards,

Greg


Previous by date: 11 Nov 2009 22:22:48 -0000 Re: Overloading the nano-X server, Greg Haerr
Next by date: 11 Nov 2009 22:22:48 -0000 Re: Overloading the nano-X server, Steven Vahl
Previous in thread: 11 Nov 2009 22:22:48 -0000 Re: Overloading the nano-X server, Greg Haerr
Next in thread: 11 Nov 2009 22:22:48 -0000 Re: Overloading the nano-X server, Steven Vahl


Powered by ezmlm-browse 0.20.