nanogui: Technical Framebuffer proposal for RTEMS graphics
Subject:
Re: Technical Framebuffer proposal for RTEMS graphics
From:
Erwin Rol ####@####.####
Date:
5 Feb 2000 19:36:26 -0000
Message-Id: <389C88A1.7637B3AE@muffin.org>
Greg Haerr wrote:
>
> : A small difference is how the access to the driver is made.
> : In your proposal, many ioctls() calls to do different things.
> :
> : The one that I proposed the driver would provide
> : a table with the entry points for the services provided
> : by the driver.
> :
> The addresses returned by the kernel aren't valid for
> user mode routines to call directly in RTEMS, right?
> They certainly aren't in Linux. That's why I suggest
> ioctl.
I believe everything is flat without protection in RTEMS ?
but it isn't in Frank's PK, and we might want to make a interface
that works on both ?
>
> Regards,
>
> Greg
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: ####@####.####
> For additional commands, e-mail: ####@####.####
