Previous by date: | 14 Apr 2000 04:05:00 -0000 Re: QT Port?, Greg Haerr |
Next by date: | 14 Apr 2000 04:05:00 -0000 Re: A few process-related questions about uWin vs. nano-X, vidar.hokstad.com |
Previous in thread: | 14 Apr 2000 04:05:00 -0000 Re: QT Port?, Greg Haerr |
Next in thread: | 14 Apr 2000 04:05:00 -0000 Re: QT Port?, Rob Taylor |
> Not yet. TrollTech has decided to build their own, non-free, non-open source > framebuffer > version of QT called Qt/Embedded. It has a similar feature set to Microwindows, > but isn't, aparently. > > Regards, > > Greg How hard would it be to port QT to nanox? Has someone looked into it? Simon
Previous by date: | 14 Apr 2000 04:05:00 -0000 Re: QT Port?, Greg Haerr |
Next by date: | 14 Apr 2000 04:05:00 -0000 Re: A few process-related questions about uWin vs. nano-X, vidar.hokstad.com |
Previous in thread: | 14 Apr 2000 04:05:00 -0000 Re: QT Port?, Greg Haerr |
Next in thread: | 14 Apr 2000 04:05:00 -0000 Re: QT Port?, Rob Taylor |