nanogui: QT Port?
Subject:
Re: QT Port?
From:
Erwin Rol ####@####.####
Date:
14 Apr 2000 17:14:41 -0000
Message-Id: <38F75245.17A27414@muffin.org>
Roberto Alsina wrote:
>
> On Fri, 14 Apr 2000, Erwin Rol wrote:
>
> > Jean-Eric Cuendet wrote:
> > >
> > > >
> > > > Guys,
> > > > how about helping Greg with the GTK/GDK Port ?
> > > > Somehow, my self, I feel better with an open source stuff
> > > > then with a product
> > > > owned by a Company.
> > > > Who guarantee, when some embedded product (using Qt) have
> > > > success on the
> > > > market, then you have to pay extra for Qt?
> > > >
> > >
> > > My thouhgts are:
> > > QT is COMPLETELY open-source (the X11 version). Event if Troll wants to,
> > No it isn't , you are not allowed to backport it to Windows! what does
> > this mean for a Win32 like API ????
>
> Methinks you have read too much propaganda lately.
> Go read the QPL, and then come back.
>
> Hint: the QPL doesn't mention platforms anywhere.
Seems like it :-) I tought i had read something like that
in a licence i got with the trial version for Windows, but
that must have been a mistake.
But i still think gtk-- is nicer :-)
so we better close this licence topic now , before
YAPCAYALA (Yet Another Person Complaining About Yet Another Licence
Argument :-)
cya,
Erwin
>
> `9_ 9 ) `-. ( ).`-._.`) ####@####.####
> (_Y_.)' ._ ) `._`. " -.-' Centro de Telematica
> _..`-'_..-_/ /-'_.' Universidad Nacional del Litoral
> (l)-'' ((i).' ((!.' Santa Fe - Argentina
> KDE Developer (MFCH)
> The stone age didn't end for a lack of stone" Firoz Rasul
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: ####@####.####
> For additional commands, e-mail: ####@####.####
