nanogui: Kaffe port


Previous by date: 24 May 2000 16:31:13 -0000 Re: progressBar control ported from minigui to microwin, Greg Haerr
Next by date: 24 May 2000 16:31:13 -0000 Greg is Chief Stategist at MontaVista, Rahul Dave
Previous in thread: 24 May 2000 16:31:13 -0000 Re: Kaffe port, Roman Guseynov
Next in thread: 24 May 2000 16:31:13 -0000 Kaffe port, Roman Guseynov

Subject: Re: Kaffe port
From: "Greg Haerr" ####@####.####
Date: 24 May 2000 16:31:13 -0000
Message-Id: <00e201bfc59d$aee761c0$15320cd0@gregh>

: > What the reason of using win32 code?
: > Maybe it is more convinient to change clib/awt/X/* of Kaffe instead of
: > clib/awt/win32/* ?
: 
: See with Greg, but AFAIK, win32 layer is more  advanced than the Xlib one.
: 
: > Then I should only "remap" Xlib calls to Gr* MWin calls (of
: > course also doing
: > other things).
: > I mean do not use any win32 code while porting.
: > Is it right way?
: 
: If you know X better than win32 and if X layer in MWin is usable, it's OK!

I suggested that the Win32 version be used first, since it is currently
a bit more advanced than the Nano-X api, and it's exact, so there
aren't changes that need to be made to each API call.

However, it may be better to use the Nano-X api, since it allows multiple
processes to connect with the server.  It just depends on how Kaffe is
to be used, in side another process or more standalone.

I'm going to be spending the next few weeks concentrating on getting
the Nano-X api up to speed for the multiple widget set ports underway.

Regards,

Greg



Previous by date: 24 May 2000 16:31:13 -0000 Re: progressBar control ported from minigui to microwin, Greg Haerr
Next by date: 24 May 2000 16:31:13 -0000 Greg is Chief Stategist at MontaVista, Rahul Dave
Previous in thread: 24 May 2000 16:31:13 -0000 Re: Kaffe port, Roman Guseynov
Next in thread: 24 May 2000 16:31:13 -0000 Kaffe port, Roman Guseynov


Powered by ezmlm-browse 0.20.