nanogui: Re: Mozilla runs on Nano-X
Subject:
Re: Fw: Mozilla runs on Nano-X
From:
####@####.####
Date:
5 Oct 2000 01:33:22 -0000
Message-Id: <Pine.LNX.4.10.10010051227140.12387-100000@helios.devel.igelaus.com.au>
Please note, sources and patches will become available within a week from
now. The address will be posted when they the site is up
On Wed, 4 Oct 2000, Greg Haerr wrote:
> Some statistics on the memory front... Peter and crew have
> almost completed a full-blown Mozilla port on Nano-X.
> (see the screenshots on the web page). Anyway, here's
> what he as to say about the relative sizes of Mozilla running
> on X vs Nano-X:
>
> : Just a quick note about memory. We had just done some (rough) comparisons
> : with Mozilla(xlib version) + X, and Mozilla(nanoX version) + NanoX.
> :
> : To put is simply, xlib version + X uses (approx) 30M more REAL memory than
> : the NanoX version + NanoX.
> :
> :
> >
> > Basically, the 18M version of Mozilla on Nano-X takes 48M
> > on X?? Is that right?
>
> :Actually mozilla+X compared to mozilla+NanoX. The big benefit is due to
> : not needing X. Although the NanoX build is 4Meg smaller than the X version
>
> This is great news. I'm extremely pleased to hear that Nano-X has
> come to the point that it can run such a sophisticated application...
>
> Regards,
>
> Greg
>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: ####@####.####
> For additional commands, e-mail: ####@####.####
>
