nanogui: How low-level should we go?


Previous by date: 28 Nov 2000 23:31:29 -0000 How low-level should we go?, Robert Hartley
Next by date: 28 Nov 2000 23:31:29 -0000 subscribe mailing list!, yzy.plg.com
Previous in thread: 28 Nov 2000 23:31:29 -0000 How low-level should we go?, Robert Hartley
Next in thread:

Subject: Re: How low-level should we go?
From: "Tasnim Ahmed" ####@####.####
Date: 28 Nov 2000 23:31:29 -0000
Message-Id: <004d01c05993$b1524f80$0101a8c0@debugger>

The framebuffer is in place in linux-vr kernel with options of 1bpp (3k fb)
and 4bpp (12k fb).

I think selecting nanoX is a good idea as the layer, transvirtual is using
fgl.

I cant agree more about the footprint, helio owners would know ;)

But pocketlinux is quite slow :(

-debugger
----- Original Message -----
From: Robert Hartley ####@####.####
To: nanogui linuxhacker ####@####.####
Sent: Tuesday, November 28, 2000 10:00 PM
Subject: How low-level should we go?


> Hi,
>
> On this Java 2 Micro Edition port for the Helio, I noticed that it does
not
> actually create any X windows itself, except the main one at 0,0,159, 159
>
> I think our friends at Transvirtual are writing to the framebuffer, but I
> would be quite happy staying a layer or two above that for portability's
> sake.
>
> I want to keep this as a Java only type thing, where everything that is
not
> in Java will be done using native methods, and the JVM (or KVM in this
case)
> will be the only application running.
>
> My concern is not so much performance,  but final footprint.
>
> Advice anyone?
>
> Robert
> --
> =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
> =  Robert Hartley                 Mail:         201 Broadway        =
> =  Central Region Systems Engineer              Cambridge, MA 02139 =
> =  Integrated Computer            Email:        ####@####.####    =
> =  Solutions, Inc.                Web Site:     www.ics.com         =
> =  Tech Support: ####@####.####  Phone:        800-800-4271        =
> =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
>
> Visit the MotifZone (www.motifzone.org) for info on Motif!
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: ####@####.####
> For additional commands, e-mail: ####@####.####
>
>

----- Original Message -----
From: Robert Hartley ####@####.####
To: nanogui linuxhacker ####@####.####
Sent: Tuesday, November 28, 2000 10:00 PM
Subject: How low-level should we go?


> Hi,
>
> On this Java 2 Micro Edition port for the Helio, I noticed that it does
not
> actually create any X windows itself, except the main one at 0,0,159, 159
>
> I think our friends at Transvirtual are writing to the framebuffer, but I
> would be quite happy staying a layer or two above that for portability's
> sake.
>
> I want to keep this as a Java only type thing, where everything that is
not
> in Java will be done using native methods, and the JVM (or KVM in this
case)
> will be the only application running.
>
> My concern is not so much performance,  but final footprint.
>
> Advice anyone?
>
> Robert
> --
> =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
> =  Robert Hartley                 Mail:         201 Broadway        =
> =  Central Region Systems Engineer              Cambridge, MA 02139 =
> =  Integrated Computer            Email:        ####@####.####    =
> =  Solutions, Inc.                Web Site:     www.ics.com         =
> =  Tech Support: ####@####.####  Phone:        800-800-4271        =
> =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
>
> Visit the MotifZone (www.motifzone.org) for info on Motif!
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: ####@####.####
> For additional commands, e-mail: ####@####.####
>
>


Previous by date: 28 Nov 2000 23:31:29 -0000 How low-level should we go?, Robert Hartley
Next by date: 28 Nov 2000 23:31:29 -0000 subscribe mailing list!, yzy.plg.com
Previous in thread: 28 Nov 2000 23:31:29 -0000 How low-level should we go?, Robert Hartley
Next in thread:


Powered by ezmlm-browse 0.20.