nanogui: CLPS7500FE chip is slowly


Previous by date: 1 Dec 2000 15:45:43 -0000 Re: CLPS7500FE chip is slowly, Alan Cox
Next by date: 1 Dec 2000 15:45:43 -0000 Re: CLPS7500FE chip is slowly, Greg Haerr
Previous in thread: 1 Dec 2000 15:45:43 -0000 Re: CLPS7500FE chip is slowly, Alan Cox
Next in thread: 1 Dec 2000 15:45:43 -0000 Re: CLPS7500FE chip is slowly, Greg Haerr

Subject: Re: CLPS7500FE chip is slowly
From: Jordan Crouse ####@####.####
Date: 1 Dec 2000 15:45:43 -0000
Message-Id: <3A27C880.631302E0@censoft.com>

Actually, I was refering to the Microwindows interface to X11 (Greg and
Jason know what I'm talking about). 
I know that the X11 drivers themselves are most excellent.  

Jordan

Alan Cox wrote:
> 
> > It is my contention that the low level framebuffer routines are very
> > good and very fast (unlike our poor X11 drivers... :( ), and that we can
> 
> The X11 low level frame buffer routines are _very_ good actually. Especially
> and in fact if anything more so for single issue processors of the past (and
> the current embedded world). They do a lot of loop unrolling.
> 
> You might want to browse the cfb code. Once you understand how the Duffs
> device and blitter macros unroll you'll be impressed
> 
> Nanogui's rendering code is nowhere near as good

Previous by date: 1 Dec 2000 15:45:43 -0000 Re: CLPS7500FE chip is slowly, Alan Cox
Next by date: 1 Dec 2000 15:45:43 -0000 Re: CLPS7500FE chip is slowly, Greg Haerr
Previous in thread: 1 Dec 2000 15:45:43 -0000 Re: CLPS7500FE chip is slowly, Alan Cox
Next in thread: 1 Dec 2000 15:45:43 -0000 Re: CLPS7500FE chip is slowly, Greg Haerr


Powered by ezmlm-browse 0.20.