nanogui: Access control
Subject:
RE: Access control
From:
Alex Holden ####@####.####
Date:
13 Dec 2000 14:40:39 -0000
Message-Id: <Pine.LNX.4.04.10012131427360.632-100000@hyperspace.linuxhacker.org>
On Wed, 13 Dec 2000, Simon Wood wrote:
> it possible to #def the code so that this option(s) can be excluded i
Yes, of course it will be optional. Both the access control and the remote
networking support.
> I assume that clients that want to use this feature(s) will have
> to have some way of being informed that they are to communicate with a
> foreign server. Will existing clients HAVE to be
> re-written/re-compiled/neither, even if they don't uses this
> feature(s)???
The nano-X protocol hasn't been frozen yet, so it's subject to change from
version to version anyway. An old client might work with a new server,
or it might not- my reccomendation would be to always rebuild your clients
when a new server is released until such a time as we consider the API to
be "stable" and freeze the protocol. Other than that, the clients
shouldn't generally need any changes.
--
------- Alex Holden -------
http://www.linuxhacker.org/
http://www.robogeeks.org/
