nanogui: vnc for nano-X question


Previous by date: 27 Feb 2001 21:40:01 -0000 Re: [iPAQ] Boot prompt on ipaq... Help needed, Sridharan Subramanian
Next by date: 27 Feb 2001 21:40:01 -0000 About Framebuffer, Along
Previous in thread: 27 Feb 2001 21:40:01 -0000 Re: vnc for nano-X question, LC. Chang
Next in thread: 27 Feb 2001 21:40:01 -0000 Re: vnc for nano-X question, George Harvey

Subject: Re: vnc for nano-X question
From: George Harvey ####@####.####
Date: 27 Feb 2001 21:40:01 -0000
Message-Id: <yam8458.612.144961144@smtp.dial.pipex.com>

Hello LC.

On 26-Feb-01, LC. Chang wrote:
>> 
[ snip ]

> Thanks for your help. I have download your version and run with
> microwin0.89pre7. There is something to fix before it can run and I
> attached the patch here. I can see you use FindBestVisual() to match
> the RGB setting between client and server. Unfortunately it did not
> work on my linux framebuffer with 16bpp. I have tried several setting
> myself but it just doesn't show the right color (seems to losing blue
> value). I think I should do further debug on RFB messages.

I didn't have a Linux framebuffer to test with at the time so I hacked
together a quick framebuffer interface for NetBSD-Amiga. It shouldn't
make a difference but the possibility is there. There is also an
interaction with the resolution of the VNC server, which server are
you using and at what colour depth?

I am in the process of building a new, faster, Linux box for cross-
compiling uClinux kernels. It has a chipset which supports VESA 2.0
modes so I will have another look at VNC and see how it behaves
with the Linux framebuffer.

Regards,
George



Previous by date: 27 Feb 2001 21:40:01 -0000 Re: [iPAQ] Boot prompt on ipaq... Help needed, Sridharan Subramanian
Next by date: 27 Feb 2001 21:40:01 -0000 About Framebuffer, Along
Previous in thread: 27 Feb 2001 21:40:01 -0000 Re: vnc for nano-X question, LC. Chang
Next in thread: 27 Feb 2001 21:40:01 -0000 Re: vnc for nano-X question, George Harvey


Powered by ezmlm-browse 0.20.