nanogui: vnc for nano-X question


Previous by date: 6 Mar 2001 21:42:19 -0000 Re: Compile errors 0.89pre7 for nano-x only on a redhat 6.2 distro, Jordan Crouse
Next by date: 6 Mar 2001 21:42:19 -0000 WineCE, final answer?, Robert Hartley
Previous in thread: 6 Mar 2001 21:42:19 -0000 Re: vnc for nano-X question, George Harvey
Next in thread: 6 Mar 2001 21:42:19 -0000 Re: vnc for nano-X question, LC. Chang

Subject: Re: vnc for nano-X question
From: George Harvey ####@####.####
Date: 6 Mar 2001 21:42:19 -0000
Message-Id: <yam8465.341.144165648@smtp.dial.pipex.com>

On 01-Mar-01, George Harvey wrote:

[ snip ].

> I've now tried VNC on a 16-bit Linux framebuffer, with a 16-bit Xvnc
> server, and the colours are indeed wrong. Running on NetBSD-Amiga,
> with a Picasso-II graphics card and my hacked-together driver, the
> colours are correct. My guess is that there is a byte-ordering
> problem somewhere (the Amiga is big-endian, PCs are little-endian).
> Unfortunately, the hard disk in my new Linux box seems to have died
> after only a couple of days use so I won't be able to investigate
> any further for a while :-(

Well, after a new hard disk, re-install, rebuild, etc. I've had
another look and it seems that I'm still not correctly matching
the server and client pixel formats in FindBestVisual(). However,
there is a quick fix for 16-bit truecolour on Linux, start the
vnc viewer as follows:

  vnc -trucolour -depth 16 <hostname:n>

where <hostname> is the name of the VNC server and <n> is the
display number. I've tried this with a 16-bit Xvnc server and
with nano-X running on a 16-bit Linux framebuffer, and the 
colours look OK.

Note: this only works with the updated viewer from my web site.
For those who missed the earlier post, get:

nx-vnc332-250800.tar.gz from
http://dspace.dial.pipex.com/town/way/fr30/uclinux/downloads/contents.shtml

Regards,
George



Previous by date: 6 Mar 2001 21:42:19 -0000 Re: Compile errors 0.89pre7 for nano-x only on a redhat 6.2 distro, Jordan Crouse
Next by date: 6 Mar 2001 21:42:19 -0000 WineCE, final answer?, Robert Hartley
Previous in thread: 6 Mar 2001 21:42:19 -0000 Re: vnc for nano-X question, George Harvey
Next in thread: 6 Mar 2001 21:42:19 -0000 Re: vnc for nano-X question, LC. Chang


Powered by ezmlm-browse 0.20.