nanogui: Re: nanoGui development


Previous by date: 5 May 1999 19:18:04 -0000 Re: nanoGui development, Alan Cox
Next by date: 5 May 1999 19:18:04 -0000 Re: nanoGui development, Alan Cox
Previous in thread: 5 May 1999 19:18:04 -0000 Re: nanoGui development, Alan Cox
Next in thread: 5 May 1999 19:18:04 -0000 Re: nanoGui development, Alan Cox

Subject: RE: nanoGui development
From: Greg Haerr ####@####.####
Date: 5 May 1999 19:18:04 -0000
Message-Id: <01BE96F9.E1722590.greg@censoft.com>

Why is that?  to keep the kernel smaller?  My initial idea matched with
yours in that user mode should do everything.  It certainly would be simpler.
However, Alistair suggested the kernel should refresh...

On Wednesday, May 05, 1999 1:55 PM, Alan Cox ####@####.#### wrote:
> > could be stopped from trashing the screen.  I also like the screen refresh being kernel's
> > responsibility.
> 
> On x86 the refresh is the user space programs job. It should save/restore the
> text maps
> 
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: ####@####.####
> For additional commands, e-mail: ####@####.####
> 
> 

Previous by date: 5 May 1999 19:18:04 -0000 Re: nanoGui development, Alan Cox
Next by date: 5 May 1999 19:18:04 -0000 Re: nanoGui development, Alan Cox
Previous in thread: 5 May 1999 19:18:04 -0000 Re: nanoGui development, Alan Cox
Next in thread: 5 May 1999 19:18:04 -0000 Re: nanoGui development, Alan Cox


Powered by ezmlm-browse 0.20.